Appendix 4: What good looks like: Area Types
Contents
- 4.1 Introduction
- 4.2 What good looks like - Highly Urban (80+ dph)
- 4.2.1 Key design principles and considerations for the Highly Urban (80+dph) Area Type
- 4.2.2 Highly Urban (80+dph) case study 1: New Islington, Manchester
- 4.2.3 Highly Urban (80+dph) case study 2: Climate Innovation District, Leeds
- 4.3 What good looks like - Urban (50+ dph)
- 4.3.1 Key design principles and considerations for the Urban (50+dph) Area Type
- 4.3.2 Urban (50+dph) case study 1: Timekeepers Square and Valette Square, Salford
- 4.3.3 Urban (50+dph) case study 2: Gills Yard, Wakefield
- 4.4 What good looks like - Suburban (40+ dph)
- 4.4.1 Key design principles and considerations for the Suburban (40+dph) Area Type
- 4.4.2 Suburban (40+dph) case study 1: Navigation Point, Castleford
- 4.4.3 Suburban (40+dph) case study 2: Curlew View, South Elmsall
- 4.5 What good looks like - Outer Suburbs and Villages (30+ dph)
- 4.5.1 Key design principles and considerations for the Outer Suburbs and Villages (30+dph) Area Type
- 4.5.2 Outer Suburbs and Villages (30+dph) case study 1: Wild Orchid Way, Pontefract
- 4.5.3 Outer Suburbs and Villages (30+dph) case study 2: Church Fields, Boston Spa
- 4.6 What good looks like – Employment
- 4.6.1 Key design principles and considerations for the Employment Area Type
- 4.6.2 Employment case study 1: Calder Park, Wakefield
- 4.6.3 Employment case study 2: Recycling and Energy Recovery Facility, Leeds
4.1 Introduction
This appendix is all about bringing the Design Code to life. Here, you will find modern built examples and best practice case studies (located within the north), which show how the Codes and Guidance within this document can be used to achieve high quality design across our district.
Each case study within this appendix gives a clear picture of the types of development we are aiming for, whilst taking into consideration the right balance of density, character, and design quality.
The case studies are organised around the different Area Types set out in the Design Code:
Residential:
Highly Urban (80+ dph)
Urban (50+ dph)
Suburban (40+ dph)
Outer Suburbs and Villages (30+ dph)
Employment:
Employment areas which consist of different forms and scales
By showing ‘what good looks like’ in practice, these examples make it easier to imagine how the Codes and Guidance can be applied through the design process.
They highlight the simple but important design choices that help to create well-designed, welcoming, and sustainable places for people to live and work.
For more detail on the Area Types themselves, what they are and where they apply, please refer to the Introduction section under A3.4.2 of the main Design Code document.
Figure 215: Shows a map of the listed Area Types across the Wakefield District
4.2 What good looks like - Highly Urban (80+ dph)
In accordance with national policy to make the best use of land, the Council supports development at the Highly Urban residential density where appropriate, as long as it does not conflict with other development plan policies.
Figure 216: An annotated sketch and associated Site Plan which highlight what good looks like for the Highly Urban (80+dph) Area Type via six key design principles
4.2.1 Key design principles and considerations for the Highly Urban (80+dph) Area Type
The design principles below highlight six key design considerations which have been illustrated in Figure 215 as follows:
Creating ‘gentle density’: Utilising a mixture of housing typologies (including town houses and small to medium footprint apartment blocks) helps to increase density in a context-sensitive and human-scaled way, whilst achieving best use of land.
Prioritising active frontages: Every dwelling has a defined entrance to activate street-facing elevations. Fenestration and architectural detailing can also enhance gables. Larger apartment blocks incorporate mix-use active ground floor uses such as retail, leisure, cafés, restaurants, or commercial spaces.
Green and welcoming streets and spaces: Street trees and planting help to soften the streetscape. Small public spaces are well-lit, well-overlooked, and offer places to rest for all users. Street layouts frame views of public spaces, landscapes, or landmarks to support intuitive way-finding.
Sensitive parking solutions: A range of well-designed parking options which include on-plot, on-street, and basement parking are successful when integrated into the design with planting and street trees to avoid visual dominance by cars.
Integrated waste management and cycle storage: Bin storage is successful when well-screened, well-located, and easily accessible for collection, whether on-plot or in a communal store. It is important for this to be considered early in the design process.
Permeable blocks for pedestrians and cyclists: Safe, attractive, and accessible routes promote active travel opportunities and enhance connectivity.
Figure 217: Town-houses in the Climate Innovation District, Leeds provide dense city centre living, whilst only 3 storeys in height
Figure 218: Each home has it’s own front door which creates a good sense of overlooking in New Islington, Manchester
Figure 219: An increase in building heights in strategic locations (such as along a waterfront as shown here in New Islington) can help to achieve higher densities
4.2.2 Highly Urban (80+dph) case study 1: New Islington, Manchester
Key information:
density ranges from 60 to 150 (dph)
developer / landowner: Urban Splash (lead), and Manchester City Council
New Islington is a mixed-use neighbourhood on the edge of Manchester City Centre. It offers a variety of modern apartments and townhouses, many set along the canal, alongside commercial units for shops, cafés, restaurants and workspaces. The development is anchored by high-quality public spaces, facilities, and green areas, which provide places for recreation and social activity. A new bus route and tram stop were also provided as part of the public transport improvements for the local area, helping to create a more resilient and sustainable community.
Figure 220: A mixture of modular town-houses and apartments face onto newly created public realm and pedestrian routes alongside the canal which link to the city centre and nearby public transport
Figure 221: The design includes secure shared parking courts, integrated into the layout to reduce car dominance
Figure 222: Homes are arranged to maximise views, daylight and privacy with screened on-plot parking integrated into the design
4.2.3 Highly Urban (80+dph) case study 2: Climate Innovation District, Leeds
Key information:
density ranges from approximately 125 to 130 (dph)
1000 homes on a 10-hectare site expected to be built by 2031
developer/landowner: Citu Group LLP
The Climate Innovation District in Leeds is a pioneering sustainable neighbourhood on the banks of the River Aire close to Leeds City Centre. It brings together lowcarbon homes set amongst green and welcoming spaces and high-quality public realm. Citu homes consist of eco-friendly features (such as sustainable integrated urban drainage systems, solar panels, green roofs and surfaces, specialist mechanical ventilation and heat recovery systems and cycle storage provisions), with walking routes and cycle paths incorporated throughout the development.
Figure 223: Medium-density housing with varied typologies, including back-to-back homes organised around light wells
Figure 224: Streets are designed for pedestrians and cyclists, with safe, accessible routes, minimal car dominance and strong active frontages which provide enclosure and surveillance
Figure 225: Green infrastructure, such as riverside parks, communal gardens and planted streetscapes, improve air quality, reduce urban heat and support biodiversity
4.3 What good looks like - Urban (50+ dph)
The Urban Area Type (where at least 50 homes a hectare are expected to be achieved) applies to Wakefield City Centre, Castleford and Pontefract Town Centres, and sites located within a 500-metre radius
Figure 226: An annotated sketch and associated Site Plan which highlight what good looks like for the Urban (50+dph) Area Type via six key design principles
4.3.1 Key design principles and considerations for the Urban (50+dph) Area Type
The design principles below highlight six key design considerations which have been illustrated in Figure 225 as follows:
Permeable blocks: Safe, attractive, and accessible pedestrian routes are provided to encourage walkability and improve connectivity.
Well-defined boundaries: Whilst front boundaries aren’t always necessary in urban areas, boundary treatments can clearly distinguish public and private spaces. Metal railings, low walls, and low-level planting are suitable options.
Shared outdoor spaces: In higher-density areas where private outdoor space is limited, communal outdoor areas are essential. Variations in building lines can help shape these shared spaces within streets and blocks, giving a sense of enclosure and security.
Integrated cycle storage and waste management: Discreetly screened bin and cycle storage maintains street quality, whilst remaining easily accessible, whether on-plot or communal. It is important for this to be considered early in the design process.
Active façades: Window placement and architectural detailing avoid blank façades and ensure that buildings ‘turn corners’ to contribute to overlooking and street activation.
Sensitive parking solutions: Thoughtfully integrated parking minimises visual impact and car dominance. Onplot, on-street, and courtyard parking is successful when well-overlooked and screened with street trees, landscaping and appropriate boundary treatments.
Figure 227: Well-defined boundaries distinguish public and private spaces in Timekeepers Square, Salford
Figure 228: A well-overlooked public square provides a place to gather, whilst also creating a pedestrian route in Timekeepers Square, Salford
Figure 229: Active gables contribute to overlooking and street activation in Gills Yard, Wakefield
4.3.2 Urban (50+dph) case study 1: Timekeepers Square and Valette Square, Salford
Key information:
density ranges from 50 to 70 (dph)
36 homes have been developed over 0.54 hectares in Timekeepers Square
a further 33 homes have also been developed over 0.58 hectares in Valette Square
developer/landowner: English Cities Fund
This residential development forms part of a phased mixed-use masterplan for the regeneration of central Salford. Timekeepers Square and Valette Square are residential neighbourhoods which consist of terraced homes within the St Philip’s Conservation Area. Reinterpreting the Georgian terrace, they integrate sensitively with the historic streetscape, with landscaped public spaces focusing on the principle of framing views of St Philip’s Church, whilst providing a network of highly permeable routes.
Figure 230: The development reinstates Salfords’ historic street pattern, enhancing legibility and reinforcing the setting of the Grade II* listed St Philip’s Church as a focal point
Figure 231: Streets are designed as home zones, prioritising pedestrians and play, with limited offstreet parking integrated into courtyards
Figure 232: Materials such as York stone paving and metal railings reinforce the traditional character of the conservation area
4.3.3 Urban (50+dph) case study 2: Gills Yard, Wakefield
Key information:
density ranges from 65 to 90 (dph)
17 townhouses and 12 new mews houses which form part of a larger regeneration project
developer/landowner: Rushbond Development Limited
Gills Yard is a new residential development consisting of contemporary mews homes in Wakefield’s historic Wood Street area. The homes feature private terraces and communal gardens, with brick in varying shades that complement the surrounding architecture. The design reactivates former back streets, enhancing the character of the streetscape and repairing the urban grain.
Figure 233: A modern interpretation of Wakefields’ traditional terraced homes. The rhythm of the roofline and the use of brick provides a contextual yet innovative approach (Image credit: Rushbond and Ravage Productions)
Figure 234: The strong building line and good sense of enclosure reinforces the development’s city centre location
Figure 235: Traditional building and roof materials give a positive contextual response to the area’s heritage
4.4 What good looks like - Suburban (40+ dph)
The Suburban Area Type (where at least 40 homes a hectare is expected to be achieved) applies throughout the Wakefield, Castleford, and Pontefract Urban Areas, excluding areas which fall into the 2 1 3 4 Urban Area Type.
Figure 236: An annotated sketch and associated Site Plan which highlight what good looks like for the Suburban (40+dph) Area Type via six key design principles
4.4.1 Key design principles and considerations for the Suburban (40+dph) Area Type
The design principles below highlight six key design considerations which have been illustrated in Figure 235 as follows:
Clear route hierarchy: From primary distributor roads to private drives, developments follow a clear street hierarchy to create legible and wellstructured neighbourhoods. Varying design treatments of the street hierarchy help to further reinforce character.
Integrated sustainable drainage systems: New developments incorporating Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SuDS) use a layered, multifunctional approach that prioritises natural solutions over engineered ones.
Space for leisure and growing: Outdoor space is essential for health and well-being. In suburban areas, private gardens can be large enough for growing, playing, and relaxing.
Sensitive parking solutions: Thoughtfully integrated parking minimises visual impact and car dominance. On plot, on-street, and courtyard parking are successful when well-overlooked, and screened with street trees, landscaping and appropriate boundary treatments.
Well-defined plot boundaries: Boundary treatments offer privacy and comfort whilst maintaining community connections. Low brick or stone walls, railings, hedges, and mixed planting are all suitable options to achieve this.
Dual aspect homes which provide appropriate overlooking: Homes designed to provide dual aspect views, ensure effective overlooking of streets and spaces, offering a level of security and safety via natural surveillance, whilst avoiding blank façades to aid with legibility and wayfinding.
Figure 237: Different surface treatments highlight a change in street hierarchy in Curlew View, South Elmsall
Figure 238: Outdoor space for health and wellbeing is provided throughout Navigation Point, Castleford
Figure 239: Parking is provided to the side of the property ensuring frontages are not visually dominated by hard-standing in Navigation Point, Castleford
4.4.2 Suburban (40+dph) case study 1: Navigation Point, Castleford
Key information:
density ranges at approximately 45 (dph)
279 homes over a 6-hectare site
developer/landowner: Greenhaven Homes Ltd.
Navigation Point is a suburban residential development along the Aire and Calder Navigation in Castleford. The development combines contemporary homes with private gardens, integrated balconies, and green spaces. Designed to maximise river views and encourage pedestrianfriendly streets, providing active travel connections and opportunities along the waterway.
Figure 240: The development features distinctive façades with eccentric window placements and white finishes, creating a unique architectural identity and a strong built form enclosing a central green space
Figure 241: The site includes green buffers and views of surrounding plants and trees, enhancing biodiversity and promoting well-being.
Figure 242: Homes are positioned to take full advantage of uninterrupted views over the Aire and Calder Navigation, offering a strong visual and emotional connection to the water
4.4.3 Suburban (40+dph) case study 2: Curlew View, South Elmsall
Key information:
density ranges at approximately 40 (dph)
188 homes over a 4.66-hectare site
developer/landowner: Keepmoat Homes
Curlew View in South Elmsall comprises of a variety of contemporary homes that give the area a new and distinct character. The development includes well-overlooked green spaces and playgrounds, whilst its orientation and layout encourage a positive interaction with Frickley Country Park. The development also offers a variety of active travel routes that connect to the wider public right of way network, whilst capturing scenic views and creating a welcoming environment.
Figure 243: The layout encourages a sense of community, with homes overlooking shared green spaces and play areas
Figure 244: Properties are within walking distance of Frickley Park, providing access to nature and recreational space
Figure 245: The contemporary architecture creates a positive new character for the area whilst respecting the scale and layout of existing homes
4.5 What good looks like - Outer Suburbs and Villages (30+ dph)
The Outer Suburbs and Villages Area Type (where at least 30 homes a hectare are expected to be achieved) applies to the remaining areas of the district. This includes other Urban Areas, Local Service Centres, Villages, and the Green Belt.
Figure 246: An annotated sketch and associated Site Plan which highlight what good looks like for the Outer Suburbs and Villages (30+dph) Area Type via six key design principles
4.5.1 Key design principles and considerations for the Outer Suburbs and Villages (30+dph) Area Type
The design principles below highlight six key design considerations which have been illustrated in Figure 245 as follows:
Variation in plot size: Varying plot sizes helps to prevent uniform housing developments by reflecting local character, supporting mixed typologies, and encouraging flexibility and adaptation. Changes in plot size can also encourage a more organic built form through the variation in building orientation and a less formal building line.
Green and welcoming streets with well-defined boundaries: Planted front gardens, hedgerows, verges, and street trees contribute to green, inviting streets. Street layouts terminate with views of surrounding landscapes to help aid legibility.
A sensitive response to the settlement edge: Transitions to countryside and urban green spaces are carefully considered. Development reduces in density and massing, whilst becoming more loosely arranged near the edge, with outward-facing homes softened by locally appropriate planting or green buffers.
Responsive infill development: New buildings on underused infill sites reflect local character and reinforce existing street patterns, scale, rhythm, and materials.
Connection to the countryside: Existing networks and routes are enhanced, with new routes created to help create a permeable development edge.
Views oriented towards local landscapes: Streets are designed to orient views toward local landscapes, enhancing legibility and sense of place.
Figure 247: Variation in plot size, shape and orientation creates a characterful development in Wild Orchid Way, Pontefract
Figure 248: Views oriented towards local landscapes including a retained mature tree in Wild Orchid Way, Pontefract
Figure 249: New development (right) responds to local character (left) in Church Fields, Boston Spa (Image credit: Historic England)
4.5.2 Outer Suburbs and Villages (30+dph) case study 1: Wild Orchid Way, Pontefract
Key information:
density ranges at approximately 31 (dph)
204 homes over an 8.91-hectare site
developer/landowner: Barratt and David Wilson Homes Ltd.
Wild Orchid Way in Pontefract provides a spacious neighbourhood with a mixture of homes, designed in a traditional architectural style. The development includes generous green spaces, and its layout promotes a sense of openness which encourages connections between homes and local communal spaces
Figure 250: Houses overlook a generous green space containing a retained mature tree at its core. The area fosters a sense of heritage and community
Figure 251: Houses are built in traditional style with the larger plot sizes accommodating detached and semi-detached homes
Figure 252: The positioning of the homes takes advantage of the area’s proximity to open countryside
4.5.3 Outer Suburbs and Villages (30+dph) case study 2: Church Fields, Boston Spa
Key information:
density ranges at approximately 31 (dph)
153 homes over an 8-hectare site
developer/landowner: Taylor Wimpey
Church Fields is a residential extension on the edge of a historic village located in Boston Spa, Yorkshire. This residential development features re-interpreted traditional stone-built homes that respect the village’s historic character and Conservation Area. Generous green spaces and retained mature trees enhance the sites setting, whilst the layout maintains strong connections with the adjacent River Wharfe and views towards the Grade II listed St Mary’s Church.
Figure 253: Houses face onto shared green spaces, creating a sense of enclosure and natural surveillance that supports a safe and welcoming community (Image credit: Historic England)
Figure 254: Traditional materials, roof forms, and architectural styles reflect and enhance the character of the village’s heritage (Image credit: Historic England)
Figure 255: A mix of house types, set-backs, and rooflines prevents monotony and brings variety and interest to the streetscape (Image credit: Historic England)
Figure 256: A well-considered corner treatment, including the sensitive use of bay windows and careful handling of side gables, to avoid blank walls and add visual interest (Image credit: Historic England)
4.6 What good looks like – Employment
The Employment Area Type applies to all scales of employment development across the district.
Figure 257: An annotated sketch which highlights what good looks like for the Employment Area Type via six key design principles
4.6.1 Key design principles and considerations for the Employment Area Type
The design principles below highlight six key design considerations which have been illustrated in Figure 256 as follows:
Attractive outdoor amenity spaces: Amenity areas that are easily accessible from building entrances offer employees and visitors a welcoming place to rest and recharge.
Active and attractive frontages with articulated façades: Architectural detailing, integrated landscaping, or public art included in employment buildings enhance visual interest, aid with legibility and avoid long blank elevations.
Active travel routes: Employment sites are successful when well-connected with safe, accessible footpaths, cycle paths, and recreational routes. These can also support informal exercise opportunities and employee health and well-being.
A sensitive transition between different uses: In areas of transition (such as where residential and employment uses meet), carefully placed and oriented large buildings create a gradual shift in height and massing to avoid overbearing effects.
Well considered parking and service areas: Thoughtfully placed and designed parking and service yards, or zones including soft landscaping and tree planting, help to further reduce visual impacts and urban heating effects.
‘Soft’ boundaries and SuDS-integrated landscape buffers: Landscape buffers incorporating Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SuDS) maximise opportunities to enhance green spaces, habitats, wildlife and water quality, whilst reducing food risk.
Figure 258: Parking areas are screened and interspersed with planting at Calder Park in Wakefield
Figure 259: Leeds Recycling and Energy Recovery Facility, where Europe’s largest living wall provides ecological benefits and softens the building’s visual impact
Figure 260: Landscape buffers which include swales in Calder Park, Wakefield
4.6.2 Employment case study 1: Calder Park, Wakefield
Key information:
set within 240 acres
100 acre nature reserve
over 70 occupiers
Calder Park is a high-quality business park located to the south of Wakefield City Centre offering a lower-density alternative to other regional business parks. Landscaped grounds, retained trees and SuDS integrate with well-connected pedestrian and cycle routes, support sustainable commuting, and increase ecological value. Buildings are thoughtfully positioned and screened by trees and planting, with modular designs creating an attractive, wellintegrated environment for high-quality businesses.
Figure 261: The lower development density than other business parks in the region allows for the preservation of open space and ecological value
Figure 262: Buildings are screened by trees and thoughtful planting which help to embed them within the landscape
Figure 263: Pedestrian footpaths are separated from the carriageway by generous grass verges encouraging walkability
4.6.3 Employment case study 2: Recycling and Energy Recovery Facility, Leeds
Key information:
42m high / 123m long
1,800 m² vertical living wall
architect: S’PACE Architecture
The Recycling and Energy Recovery Facility in Leeds features a striking design inspired by World War One (WWI) airship hangars, giving it a distinctive silhouette that contributes to Leeds city skyline. The site includes landscaped areas, dedicated pedestrian and cycle routes, EV charging points and bike storage. Modular construction methods reduced environmental impact and improved safety during the installation.
Figure 264: The facilities design, inspired by WWI airship hangars, creates a distinctive silhouette that enhances Leeds’ skyline and identity.
Figure 265: Solar panels are designed into the structure emphasising the building’s sustainable credentials.
Figure 266: The facility achieved “Excellent” ratings under BREEAM and CEEQUAL, reflecting its high standards in environmental performance.