B1.3.1 Sensitively integrating with the urban grain
Code: 1.14c
Applicants must provide a clear narrative outlining how the proposals integrate with and respect the local context in terms of strategic layout (such as the placement of streets, routes, and focal points) and pattern of development (which includes how buildings and homes are placed and spaced together). This must take reference from the Site Appraisal Assessment (1.1c, and where applicable 1.2g) and the Local Character and Context Assessment (1.3c, and where applicable 1.4g).
The narrative must demonstrate how the layout positively responds to the character of the site and its wider context.
Exception: Where the Local Character and Context Assessment cannot determine a clear and positive existing urban grain.
Guidance: 1.15g
Where the elements of the existing urban grain are not positive or are fragmented, applicants should refer to the historic urban grain and seek to restore this (for example, where there is existing cul-de-sac development in an area that was historically more linear).
Exception: Where no historic urban grain is available applicants should consider:
designing a layout that responds to existing natural features like topography, waterways, and vegetation to create a sense of place
using principles of human-scale design to ensure walkability, clear routes, and welldefined public and private spaces
applying best practice in urban design to establish a legible street network with varied building forms and rhythms that encourage community interaction
Figure 11: Shows a sketch which illustrates how new development can help to repair the historic urban grain (Guidance: 1.15g). Source: National Model Design Code
Guidance: 1.16g
To respect the urban grain, development proposals should:
extend the existing street network to create seamless continuity with surrounding areas
utilise a similar plot and block size to manage mass and spacing (recognising these can be subdivided for modern standards whilst retaining the appearance of the larger block)
include locally typical interventions in the public realm (squares, small greens etc) to articulate the layout
Guidance: 1.17g
New major residential developments should vary density across the site to create areas of distinctive character, enabling a more nuanced and responsive layout. Whilst densities may differ from the immediate locality, proposals should demonstrate how these variations contribute positively to placemaking and integrate sensitively with the surrounding urban grain and character.
Figure 12: Shows a sketch which illustrates how changes in density can create variations in built form (Guidance: 1.17g). Source: National Model Design Code
Guidance: 1.18g
Where new high-density development is proposed, the development should include well-designed and strategically located open spaces. New open spaces should:
provide pleasant and open views to enhance the experience and orientation of users
be predominantly south-west facing to maximise natural daylight and warmth
avoid being placed in permanent shadow cast by surrounding buildings, ensuring usability, comfort, and environmental quality throughout the day and seasons
Figure 13: Illustrates how higher density development can be carefully located and positioned to avoid overshadowing (Guidance: 1.18g) and provide a gradual transition to adjacent buildings
Guidance: 1.19g
Where applying Area Type densities that differ from the immediate context, development proposals should:
carefully assess the location of proposed density and massing
draw upon positive examples from across the district or refer to the examples demonstrated within What good looks like: Area Types (Appendix 4)
take reference from the undertaken Site Appraisal Assessment and Local Character and Context Assessment (as listed under 1.1c, 1.2g, and 1.3c and 1.4g)